1. In the opening of Hall's writing, he ascribes a "common" characteristic to culture—one that isn't privileged but rather emerges from the routine of everyday life. In the op-ed, Butler briefly delves into the concept of common sense, noting its role in maintaining the status quo and exacerbating unjust realities. While I haven't fully grasped these ideas yet, it seems that they hold distinct perspectives on what is considered common, ordinary, and worthy of study. This raises the question: does cultural studies consistently challenge the unjust status quo? Is Hall more of an observer in his writing, while Butler adopts a more rebellious stance?
2. Do cultural studies scholars typically focus solely on structuralism or on culturalism? Or is there room for them to embrace both paradigms, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the subject?
Comments
Post a Comment